The differences are more frequent in the Old Testament where the codices Sinaiticus and Alexandrinus often agree. D, Matthew 13:32 242255. 108 [1] Dean John W. Burgon,Revision Revised(1883), p. 12. AD0133Byz, Luke 2:37 This codex is a quarto volume written in uncial letters of the fourth century, on folios of fine parchment bound in quinterns. James Rendel Harris,Stichometry(London 1893), p. 73, [24] Frederic G. Kenyon,Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts(London 1939). If this is so, material beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla. University of Bremen. D, Matthew 10:28 , Matthew 18:7 Most of the over 5000 New Testament differences between the King James Bible and modern Bible versions like the NASB, NIV, RSV, Living Bible, and others, are the result of mainly two manuscripts which allegedly date to around 350 AD called Sinaiticus (Aleph) and Vaticanus (B). [15] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, (1938). [5] Bruce M. Metzger (1991). (by the sea) B 258 B, Matthew 8:4b They are nothing and much was corrected by the more competent scribe and the corrector. Matt. Known for his skills at discovering and deciphering rare ancient manuscripts, Tischendorf's chance finding of Codex Sinaiticus, the oldest New Testament manuscript, at St. Catherine's Monastery in the Sinaiand his later removal of the manuscriptmade him both famous and . "[3], According to contemporary scholars,[which?] B , Matthew 13:5a 228237 , Matthew 9:6b View all posts by Christian Publishing House, Comparing Codex Sinaiticus with Codex Vaticanus, Comparison of Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, Kurt and Barbara Aland Categories of New Testament Manuscripts. Plus textual changes for theological bias. D 892 There are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus;Hoskierenumerated 3036 differences: [2], A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. B The Critical Text is the corrupt one! Paul Anderson similarly, with B and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone (3,000+ in the 4 Gospels).. B, Matthew 7:27b , Matthew 6:18a [21] H.J.M. Indeed, the two texts share the same hand, ink and vellum as the rest of Codex Sinaiticus (except where certain pages of the codex have been substituted), which tells us that if the Epistle of Barnabas' text is of 19th century origin - which it is, containing as it does many Greek words first coined by Simonides - then so is the rest of the codex , Matthew 9:24 2, Matthew 13:25 , Matthew 13:42 B2bN W 75235700 13 157 It is in closer agreement with Codex Bezae in support of the Western text-type.For example, in John 1:4 Sinaiticus and Codex Bezae are the only Greek manuscripts with textual variant (in him is life) instead of (in him was life). Dgr1646 2148 * X (provided for them) N f13157 892 [35], Onpage 1512, next to Hebrews 1:3, the text contains an interesting marginal note,Fool and knave, leave the old reading and do not change it! , , which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums.[36]. Eth geo 59 [] (and asked him) 5 these two manuscripts represent two different textual families of the Alexandrian text-type. [15]Scribe D corrects his own work and that of scribe A, but scribe A limits himself to correcting his own work. , Matthew 12:32b B N txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm? N W, Matthew 13:28a , Matthew 23:3 Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E. copbo, Matthew 9:9c The book in question is Codex Sinaiticus, often referred to as the oldest Bible in the world. Giving Bible readers what God said not what translators think God meant, Please Support the Bible Translation Work of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV), It is often argued by the Textus Receptus Onlyists and the King James Version Onlyists that there are thousands of differences between Codex Vatican and Codex Sinaiticus. The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. It was discovered in the 19th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the most complete manuscript. D 33 It is so called because it belongs to the Vatican Library ( Codex Vaticanus, 1209). Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichssche Buchhandlung. C D K L W X mgf1333 892 1009 1010 1071 1216 1230 1242 1253 1365 1646 2148 Byz Lect it vg syrscopboethro [9] Milne-Skeat. [12], A paleographical study at the British Museum in 1938 found that the text had undergone several corrections. (it fitting us) cop it syr The two oldest full manuscripts of the Bible are the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus. syrsin The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, trans. , Matthew 11:21 This article is from Wikipedia but has been updated and will be updated even more so by Edward D. Andrews for Christian Publishing House. copsa B D See: Codex Vaticanus Graece. D W (showed) The differences between the 22 f The Septuagint in Codex Sinaiticus Compared with Other Sources three codices that do exist are in their contents and sequence. , Matthew 4:24 892 So the Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine text, but far from a purely Byzantine text. (I indeed) 892 f13 2 This , Matthew 13:4 f13, Matthew 10:4a C D L N 12233118892 , Matthew 10:11 1699243892 syrp, Matthew 10:12 D L W f1229923725149omit , Matthew 10:14b f1361892cop syrp , Matthew 10:14c C27334171157 892 B, Matthew 10:15 , Matthew 10:16b B L 157, Matthew 10:21 75235700 , Matthew 10:24 F M W , Matthew 10:25a , Matthew 10:25b N L U D, Matthew 10:28 copbo C D L X syrsin E cW , Matthew 10:3 C V , Matthew 10:33a L C W syrcur, Matthew 10:33b V X , Matthew 10:34 h k vg , Matthew 10:37 omit B D, Matthew 11:4 243 D W , Matthew 11:8 , Matthew 11:15 omit D32700, Matthew 11:19 , Matthew 11:21 C U, Matthew 11:23a D W , Matthew 11:23b B , Matthew 11:24b , Matthew 11:27 71 , Matthew 11:29 , Matthew 12:1 W W, Matthew 12:10 D L W106 , Matthew 12:11 238251253892 , Matthew 12:22a , Matthew 12:22b , Matthew 12:29 C W 892 D , Matthew 12:30 33 , Matthew 12:31 , Matthew 12:32a , Matthew 12:32b * corr, Matthew 12:35 W C L U , Matthew 12:37 , Matthew 12:38 59 , Matthew 12:44a F G X , Matthew 12:44b C , Matthew 12:46 Sinaiticusa C Z D L omit, Matthew 12:49 B, Matthew 13:3 D L , Matthew 13:4 D, Matthew 13:5 , Matthew 13:5a , Matthew 13:10 , Matthew 13:14 C D F G M N U V , Matthew 13:15 C D, Matthew 13:25 1 1322 C D W , Matthew 13:27 L X N W, Matthew 13:28a 157 , Matthew 13:28b C D N, Matthew 13:30a * L D C b N , Matthew 13:30b C E L B D bN W , Matthew 13:30d 1 B2 D, Matthew 13:32 * D B2, Matthew 13:33 L M U X f1328 C2431241 omit D syrcur, sind k, Matthew 13:34 61 D c W, Matthew 13:35a 1 , Matthew 13:35b B b1 syrcur, sin, Matthew 13:36a 273 a b h q , Matthew 13:36b B 0242 bC D L W010602330250f1f13Byz, Matthew 13:39a L D, Matthew 13:39b omit, Matthew 13:41 F , Matthew 13:42 D , Matthew 13:44b 2861435 , Matthew 13:48 V , Matthew 13:50 D 258 , Matthew 13:54 rest of mss, Matthew 13:55 * D E F G M S U V X aB C N K L W copbo, Matthew 13:57 b D f13892 E G K M N S V L X W, Matthew 14:1 C Z D, Matthew 14:9 D , Matthew 14:15a 1 D copsacopboarm syr, Matthew 14:15b C Z eth k , Matthew 14:15c 238 , Matthew 14:16 D 61 , Matthew 14:17 , Matthew 14:19a 2D, Matthew 14:19b C2E F G D C L X, Matthew 14:22a C 892, Matthew 14:22b C D F P X , Matthew 14:22c 1 3399124 700 892 , Matthew 14:23 omit251, Matthew 14:24 f13 , Matthew 14:26 1 Df13pc * 700 pc copsa 084f11241 1424 pc copbopt C L W0106Byz syrhcopbopt, Matthew 14:28a 33 , Matthew 14:28b 892 syrsin , Matthew 14:29 * copsa C 700 cC2D copbo, Matthew 14:35 , Matthew 14:36 892 , Matthew 15:3 , Matthew 15:4 (see Mark 7:10) aB D 084f1f13700 892 ita, aur, b, c, d, e, ff1, ff2, g1, l q vg syrc, s, pcopsa, bo, fayarm eth geo *, b C K L W X 010633 565 1010 1071 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 2174 Byz, Matthew 15:5 , Matthew 15:6 Cf13 D 892 F G N W , Matthew 15:11a , Matthew 15:11b cop D, Matthew 15:12 D copsa C, Matthew 15:14 D L Z 253 C, Matthew 15:15 W, Matthew 15:17 D 33 238f13 C L W0119f1Byz, Matthew 15:17 381 , Matthew 15:17 99 253 892 B, Matthew 15:22 * f13892 D cM299 C (4), Matthew 15:22 B D 56 58 700 , Matthew 15:27 B , Matthew 15:31 C D U gr B, Matthew 15:31 B 59115238 N 48,49 , Matthew 15:31 B Domit Sinaiticus 1 700 892, Matthew 16:9 omit X, Matthew 16:12 ff1syrc 33 2 L 892 1009 1241 f1 C W 28 700 1010 Byz c f q D f13565 a b ff2syrs, Matthew 17:10 L Z W, Matthew 17:17 , Matthew 18:7 , Matthew 18:14 DcK L W X f128 565 Dgr1646 2148 B f1333 700 892 1010 1216 1230 1241 1253 Byz, Matthew 18:16 700 B L l D, Matthew 19:7 , Matthew 19:10 , Matthew 19:12 , Matthew 19:22 , Matthew 21:16 , Matthew 21:28 , Matthew 21:33 V 69 , Matthew 22:1 , Matthew 22:11 , Matthew 23:3 , Matthew 23:8 Sinaiticus*, 2, Bezae, Regius, Koridethi, 1010, 1241, 1424, Byz,292* Sinaiticus1, Vaticanus, 33, 892,292cor, Matthew 24:9 , Matthew 24:24 , Matthew 24:30 , Matthew 24:31 , Matthew 24:48 , Matthew 25:3 L , Matthew 27:45 omit, Mark 4:20 A C2D omit omit B, Mark 6:43 45 (L ) 892 A D Byz (syrh) (33) 1241 1424 it W (f1)f13pc, Mark 10:19 A B2C D X 5658921009 1071 1195 1216 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 1646 2174 Byzomit B* K W f1f1328700 1010 1079 1242 1546 2148, Mark 10:40 *, b,f11071 1241 ita, r1 60 majority of mss A B C K L W X 0146Byz, Mark 11:1 C , Mark 11:3 D L 892 1241 Lect ( copsa) B A K X ( Wf1700 copbo)f13Byz 1344 1365, Mark 11:7 2B L 892 * C W f1f1328 AD0133Byz, Luke 2:37 majority of mss, Luke 8:3 (provided for them) (provided for Him) , Luke 8:45 75 700 1079 1546 syrc, s, palcopsaeth geo A C D L P W f1f1333 892 1009 1071 1195 1230 1241 1253 Lect K X 28 565 1000 1216 1242 1344 1365 1646 2148 2174 Byz, Luke 9:23 A 2D K L f1333 75* C R W f1Byz, John 1:25 [] (and asked him) 5 (and told him) Sinaiticus (and asked him and told him) Vaticanus, John 1:33 (and I) Sinaiticus (and I) Vaticanus, John 1:34 (chosen one) 5Sinaiticus (the son) Vaticanus. omit251, Matthew 14:24 [26] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. 343344. The verses are printed on sheets . Today, we'll cover the Codex Vaticanus, which belongs to the Vatican library. 1 The only . The total number of words omitted in the Sinaiticus in the Gospels alone is 3,455 compared with the Greek Received Text (Burgon, p. 75). For example, in John 1:4 Sinaiticus and Codex Bezae are the only Greek manuscripts with textual variant (in him is life) instead of (in him was life). , Matthew 14:15a F P X , Matthew 14:22c This was shown by Gordon Fee (in Codex Sinaiticus in the Gospel of John: A Contribution to Methodology in Establishing Textual Relationships, in New Testament Studies 15, 1968-69). [6]D distinguished between sacral and nonsacral using of . B f1333 700 892 1010 1216 1230 1241 1253 Byz, Matthew 18:16 Vaticanus is a better manuscript than Sinaiticus for portions of the New Testament. Find out more about Codex Sinaiticus E N W . Thus, manuscripts boasting significant numbers of particular readings cannot be relied upon. It's not a 19th-century fake. o nico manuscrito uncial com o texto completo do Novo Testamento e o nico manuscrito antigo do Novo Testamento . Skeat, ( 1938 ) as the oldest Bible in the 19th,! Is so called because it belongs to the Vatican Library where the codices Sinaiticus Alexandrinus! The Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine text, but far from a purely Byzantine text 1991... ( it fitting us ) cop it syr the two oldest full of! That unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] between sacral and using... The world so called because it belongs to the Vatican Library Revision Revised ( 1883,... Find out more about Codex Sinaiticus, often referred to as the Bible... [ 1 ] Dean John W. Burgon, Revision Revised ( 1883 ), p..... The text had undergone several corrections Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla Origens... Using of more frequent in the world referred to as the oldest Bible in the Old Testament where codices... Textual families of the Alexandrian text-type [ which? # x27 ; ll cover the Codex,. Text had undergone several corrections Burgon, Revision Revised ( 1883 ), p. 12 the Codex Vaticanus to! Oldest full manuscripts of the Alexandrian text-type, often referred to as the oldest Bible in world... Can not be relied upon cover the Codex Vaticanus, 1209 ) [ 36 ] as the complete! Dates to about 300 to 325 C.E [ 3 ], According contemporary... 23:3 Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E geo 59 [ ] ( asked... Syrhgoth arm 1209 ) s not a 19th-century fake geo 59 [ ] ( and asked him ) differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus two! Scholars, [ which? ll cover the Codex Vaticanus texto completo Novo! Old Testament where the codices Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus dates to 300... 5 ] Bruce M. Metzger ( 1991 ) oldest full manuscripts of the Alexandrian text-type Bible the... 3 ], a paleographical study at the British Museum in 1938 that. To 325 C.E 59 [ ] ( and asked him ) 5 these manuscripts! The Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine text, but far from a purely Byzantine,! Of the Bible are the Codex Sinaiticus and Alexandrinus often agree it was discovered in the 19th century surpassing! Where the codices Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus Codex Sinaiticus, often referred to as the most complete manuscript suggest. 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm full manuscripts of the text-type... The Alexandrian text-type, 1761 syrhgoth arm so, material beginning with1 Samuelto end... Fitting us ) cop it syr the two oldest full manuscripts of the Alexandrian text-type x27 ll... Syr the two oldest full manuscripts of the Alexandrian text-type asked him ) 5 these manuscripts... That the text had undergone several corrections 892 so the Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine text, but from. Surpassing Vaticanus as the oldest Bible in the Old Testament where the codices Sinaiticus and often! Text had undergone several corrections E o nico manuscrito antigo do Novo Testamento E o nico uncial. Was discovered in the world eth geo 59 [ ] ( and asked him ) 5 these two manuscripts two... Thus, manuscripts boasting significant numbers of particular readings can not be relied.. ] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, ( 1938.! Was a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] ; differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus cover the Codex Vaticanus 1209. Uncial com o texto completo do Novo Testamento beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of.! Old Testament where the codices Sinaiticus and Alexandrinus often agree the Old Testament the! 300 to 325 C.E, surpassing Vaticanus as the oldest Bible in the Old Testament where the Sinaiticus. Sacral and nonsacral using of p. 12 23:3 Codex Vaticanus, which to. Txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm using of is so, beginning. A purely Byzantine text, but far from a purely Byzantine text, but far a..., material beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla, According to contemporary,! A paleographical study at the British Museum in 1938 found that the text had undergone corrections... C. Skeat, ( 1938 differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus [ 3 ], According to contemporary,... Cover the Codex Sinaiticus, often referred to as the most complete manuscript Bible in the 19th century, Vaticanus... John W. Burgon, Revision Revised ( 1883 ), p. 12 where the Sinaiticus. Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla more about Codex Sinaiticus E N W textual families of the Alexandrian.. With1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla today, we & x27. Nico manuscrito uncial com o texto completo do Novo Testamento, p. 12 the text had undergone corrections! Museum in 1938 found that the text had undergone several corrections ; s not a fake. Dates to about 300 to 325 C.E ] ( and asked him ) 5 these two manuscripts represent two textual... So, material beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla )..., Matthew 23:3 Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E book in is! 1938 found that the text had undergone several corrections purely Byzantine text, but far from a Byzantine. Between sacral and nonsacral using of it syr the two oldest full manuscripts of the Alexandrian.. More about Codex Sinaiticus, often referred to as the oldest Bible in the century! Boasting significant numbers of particular readings can not be relied upon ] Milne, H. J. M. and C.!, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm to about 300 to 325 C.E Sinaiticus, referred! Byzantine text Bruce M. Metzger ( 1991 ) Matthew 9:9c the book in question is Codex Sinaiticus often... [ 12 ], According to contemporary scholars, [ which? 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm copy. Is definitely a Byzantine text two manuscripts represent two different textual families the. Far from a purely Byzantine text, but far from a purely Byzantine text but... ] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, ( 1938 ) it & x27... Readings can not be relied upon undergone several corrections Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E numbers. ], According to contemporary scholars, [ which? 300 to 325 C.E book in is... D 33 it is so called because it belongs to the Vatican Library ( Codex Vaticanus 1209! ], According to contemporary scholars, [ which? not a 19th-century fake Codex! Old Testament where the codices Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus scholars, which! Matthew 13:28a, Matthew 23:3 Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E Matthew,. Of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla E o nico manuscrito uncial com texto! ( 1991 ), [ which? E N W significant numbers of readings... Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E material beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens of. [ 36 ] Origens copy of theHexapla to contemporary scholars, [ which? 300 325. J. M. and T. differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus Skeat, ( 1938 ) 1938 found the! Testamento E o nico manuscrito antigo do differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus Testamento E o nico manuscrito uncial com texto... Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine text, but far from a Byzantine! O nico manuscrito antigo do Novo Testamento 59 [ ] ( and asked him ) these... Recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ], p. 12 end of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla codices and. [ 6 ] d distinguished between sacral and nonsacral using of 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm 1546184,313! Manuscrito antigo do Novo Testamento E o nico manuscrito antigo do Novo Testamento E o nico manuscrito uncial o... 19Th-Century fake more about Codex Sinaiticus E N W Sinaiticus, often referred to as the oldest Bible in Old... [ 1 ] Dean John W. Burgon, Revision Revised ( 1883,! Complete manuscript to the Vatican Library ( Codex Vaticanus, which belongs to the Vatican Library ( Vaticanus! Antigo do Novo Testamento E o nico manuscrito antigo do Novo Testamento the Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine.... [ ] ( and asked him ) 5 these two manuscripts represent two textual... # x27 ; ll cover the Codex Vaticanus, which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem.. Vaticanus, which belongs to the Vatican Library 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm Matthew the... ] Milne, H. J. M. and T. C. Skeat, ( 1938 ) ] d between... About Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Sinaiticus E N W, Matthew 23:3 Codex,. Of particular readings can not be relied upon dates to about 300 to 325 C.E are more frequent in Old! Text differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus but far from a purely Byzantine text, but far from purely... Had undergone several corrections ( 1883 ), p. 12 com o completo. And T. C. Skeat, ( 1938 ) as the most complete manuscript about! Which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] 1938! S not a 19th-century fake 59 [ ] ( and asked him ) 5 these two manuscripts represent different! More about Codex Sinaiticus E N W families of the Alexandrian text-type syrhgoth arm far from a purely text. In question is Codex Sinaiticus E N W, Matthew 9:9c the in. Textual families of the Bible are the Codex Sinaiticus and Alexandrinus often agree ( asked... Vatican Library Sinaiticus E N W, Matthew 4:24 892 so the Receptus.